Details and Metadata
Printer-friendly version View XML version Download Ecological Metadata Language file
Methods
The methods followed in the creation of the dataset, including description of field, laboratory and processing steps, and quality control procedures
Current Methods
Plot Establishment
Started: 2017-07-01Four pairs of 10 m x 10 m permanent plots were established in two unique locations. The two locations are characterized by relatively level terrain with a mixed oak overstory. The fenced and unfenced paired plots are separated from one another by a 5m buffer. The unfenced and fenced treatments were randomly assigned to the plots at each location. Fenced treatment plots were enclosed by a 2.5m-tall fence. A small (~25cm x 25cm) hole was cut at ground level on each side of the fence to allow smaller animals access to the fenced area. To permanently identify the unfenced plots, all four corners were marked with metal fence posts. A corner of origin was identified (to facilitate locating trees, saplings, etc. in the following years using a grid system). Sampling occurs in the summer, ideally in July, on the year of installation and every 5 years afterwards.
Sapling Layer
Started: 2017-07-01All individuals whose growth habits are designated as ātreeā by the New York Flora Atlas, who are between 0.5 and 2 m tall with at least 50% of their stem(s) emerging from the ground inside of the plot will be evaluated in the sapling layer the year of exclosure installation and every 5 years afterwards. Each stem that emerges from the ground at a distinct location is considered a sapling. Saplings are tagged and assigned a number. The coordinate position (X and Y distance from the designated āoriginā, in meters) is measured, primarily so that researchers can find saplings whose tags have fallen off between monitoring rounds. The presence/absence of browse, species, and undisturbed height (cm) to the tallest bud (without stretching the shoot) are measured.
Dataset Fields
Detailed documentation of the fields comprising the dataset, including the type of measurement, units where applicable, and any controlled vocabularies or code lists present in the data
Field Name Caption Description Additional Information Browse Browse Measurement type: Nominal Height_ Height_ Measurement type: ITIS_Code ITIS_Code Measurement type: Measure_date Measure_date Measurement type: DateTime
Date/Time Format: M/D/YYYYPlot Plot Measurement type: Sap__ID_# Sap__ID_# Measurement type: Nominal Species Species Species codes
Measurement type: Nominal
The impact of deer overabundance on forest regeneration mohonk preserve
+ showAppears in data as Meaning CAOV shagbark hickory (Carya ovata) - QURU northern red oak (Quercus rubra) - CACA American hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana) - OSVI eastern hophornbeam; hophornbeam (Ostrya virginiana) - ACSA sugar maple (Acer saccharum) - FRAM white ash (Fraxinus americana) - ACRU red maple (Acer rubrum) - QUAL white oak (Quercus alba) - QUMO chestnut oak (Quercus prinus) - VIAC mapleleaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium) - Study_Yr__ Study_Yr__ Measurement type: Treatment Treatment Measurement type: Nominal Treatment_# Treatment_# Measurement type: X_Coord_ X_Coord_ Measurement type: Y_Coord_ Y_Coord_ Measurement type: Sampling Equipment
Equipment and software used to collect data, including how that equipment was used.
No sampling equipment recorded for this dataset
Site Characteristics
The spatial extent of the dataset site coverage, and descriptions of the spatial extent and context for the data collection
- Site Description
To evaluate the impact of deer overabundance in the mixed upland oak forests of Mohonk Preserve, four paired plots were established in various vegetation stands. The plots contain red oak, chestnut oak, sugar maple, American hophornbeam, witchhazel, and shagbark hickory. Two plots are in the northeastern portion of the preserve, and two are in the southwestern portion. All plots are relatively flat with a closed canopy and few rocks.
Minimum Altitude: 128 meters
Maximum Altitude: 303 meters